For Christmas I received an intriguing gift from a buddy - my very own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (great title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and it has glowing reviews.

Yet it was entirely written by AI, with a couple of simple prompts about me provided by my good friend Janet.

It's a fascinating read, and extremely amusing in parts. But it likewise meanders quite a lot, and is someplace in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty design of composing, however it's also a bit recurring, and very verbose. It might have surpassed Janet's prompts in collecting data about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading innovation journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a strange, repetitive hallucination in the form of my cat (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of companies online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the primary executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had sold around 150,000 personalised books, primarily in the US, since pivoting from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to produce them, based upon an open source large language model.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who developed it, kenpoguy.com can order any additional copies.

There is presently no barrier to anybody creating one in anybody's name, including celebrities - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around abusive content. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer specifying that it is imaginary, created by AI, forum.altaycoins.com and developed "solely to bring humour and joy".

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, however Mr Mashiach worries that the product is intended as a "customised gag gift", and the books do not get offered even more.

He wants to expand his range, producing different genres such as sci-fi, and perhaps providing an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted form of consumer AI - offering AI-generated products to human consumers.

It's also a bit terrifying if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least because it probably took less than a minute to produce, and it does, photorum.eclat-mauve.fr certainly in some parts, sound simply like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have revealed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out comparable material based upon it.

"We need to be clear, when we are talking about data here, we actually suggest human developers' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to regard developers' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is photos. It's artworks. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a song including AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had actually not granted it. It didn't stop the track's developer attempting to nominate it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were fake, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not believe making use of generative AI for imaginative functions should be prohibited, however I do believe that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on people's work without consent need to be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be very powerful but let's build it fairly and relatively."

OpenAI says Chinese rivals utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have selected to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online material for training purposes. Others have actually chosen to team up - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for wiki.lafabriquedelalogistique.fr example.

The UK federal government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would permit AI developers to utilize developers' content on the web to assist establish their designs, unless the rights holders opt out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "insanity".

He mentions that AI can make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and destroying the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is likewise strongly versus getting rid of copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth creators, 2.4 million jobs and a whole lot of joy," says the Baroness, who is likewise an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is undermining one of its finest performing industries on the unclear pledge of development."

A federal government representative said: "No relocation will be made until we are absolutely positive we have a useful plan that provides each of our goals: increased control for ideal holders to assist them accredit their material, access to high-quality product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more openness for best holders from AI designers."

Under the UK government's brand-new AI plan, a nationwide information library consisting of public data from a wide range of sources will also be provided to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal rules to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to improve the safety of AI with, to name a few things, firms in the sector forum.batman.gainedge.org needed to share details of the workings of their systems with the US government before they are launched.

But this has now been reversed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, but he is said to want the AI sector to deal with less policy.

This comes as a variety of claims versus AI firms, and especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been gotten by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They declare that the AI firms broke the law when they took their content from the web without their approval, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "reasonable use" and are therefore exempt. There are a number of elements which can make up reasonable usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it collects training information and qoocle.com whether it must be paying for it.

If this wasn't all sufficient to contemplate, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it established its technology for a fraction of the price of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's present dominance of the sector.

When it comes to me and a career as an author, I think that at the moment, if I actually want a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weak point in generative AI tools for bigger tasks. It is full of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be rather challenging to check out in parts due to the fact that it's so verbose.

But offered how rapidly the tech is evolving, I'm not sure the length of time I can stay confident that my substantially slower human writing and modifying skills, are much better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest developments in international technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the globe.

Outside the UK? Register here.